<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comentários em: qui FTP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://v1.pedrocavaco.adamastor.org/2006/06/13/qui-ftp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://v1.pedrocavaco.adamastor.org/2006/06/13/qui-ftp/</link>
	<description>Página pessoal do Pedro Cavaco</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Dec 2024 01:37:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Por: Pedro Cavaco</title>
		<link>http://v1.pedrocavaco.adamastor.org/2006/06/13/qui-ftp/#comment-2933</link>
		<dc:creator>Pedro Cavaco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 21:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pedrocavaco.adamastor.org/2006/06/13/qui-ftp/#comment-2933</guid>
		<description>Gostava de conhecer a história toda...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gostava de conhecer a história toda&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Por: João Matos</title>
		<link>http://v1.pedrocavaco.adamastor.org/2006/06/13/qui-ftp/#comment-2929</link>
		<dc:creator>João Matos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 16:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pedrocavaco.adamastor.org/2006/06/13/qui-ftp/#comment-2929</guid>
		<description>O windows (NT -&gt;) tem código do dos/windows, do NT que adquiram ao adquirir uma empresa, do OS/2 que a Microsoft estava desenvolver na altura em pareceria com a IBM e do BSD gandes implementações de protocolos e ferramentes de redes.
Sabe-se lá mais o quê...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>O windows (NT -&gt;) tem código do dos/windows, do NT que adquiram ao adquirir uma empresa, do OS/2 que a Microsoft estava desenvolver na altura em pareceria com a IBM e do BSD gandes implementações de protocolos e ferramentes de redes.<br />
Sabe-se lá mais o quê&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Por: Pedro Cavaco</title>
		<link>http://v1.pedrocavaco.adamastor.org/2006/06/13/qui-ftp/#comment-2927</link>
		<dc:creator>Pedro Cavaco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 12:20:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pedrocavaco.adamastor.org/2006/06/13/qui-ftp/#comment-2927</guid>
		<description>Descohecia o facto, interesante...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Descohecia o facto, interesante&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Por: João Matos</title>
		<link>http://v1.pedrocavaco.adamastor.org/2006/06/13/qui-ftp/#comment-2925</link>
		<dc:creator>João Matos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2006 23:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pedrocavaco.adamastor.org/2006/06/13/qui-ftp/#comment-2925</guid>
		<description>&quot;Linux NetKit

[ history security download ]

In the summer of 1996 I took over responsibility for the Linux NetKit package. This is the package that consists of such little-used and insignificant programs as telnet and finger.

Installing these things had always been a chancy business, all the way back to the days when there was NET1 and NET2 and you were lucky to get binaries that ran, much less source that would compile. Florian LaRoche&#039;s NetKit packages did a good job of reigning in that chaos. Finally there was one single authoritative source for most of the programs and there was a known place one could go and pick them up.

Unfortunately getting NetKits to compile was a bit of a chore, and Florian himself disappeared off the net for a while, so by June of 1996 there hadn&#039;t been any updates in a good while and various changes to the kernel and libc made the existing NetKit versions excessively hard to work with. More importantly, there was at least one outstanding security problem.

There had been a bunch of NetKits, but only NetKit-A and NetKit-B had wide distribution. NetKit-A was almost entirely just repackaging of things maintained by other people, while NetKit-B contained a pile of modified BSD code that had been maintained by Florian. Since most of the contents of NetKit-A had been updated separately since NetKit-A was last released, I simply killed off NetKit-A, and continued with just NetKit-B. &quot; (http://www.hcs.harvard.edu/~dholland/computers/old-netkit.html)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Linux NetKit</p>
<p>[ history security download ]</p>
<p>In the summer of 1996 I took over responsibility for the Linux NetKit package. This is the package that consists of such little-used and insignificant programs as telnet and finger.</p>
<p>Installing these things had always been a chancy business, all the way back to the days when there was NET1 and NET2 and you were lucky to get binaries that ran, much less source that would compile. Florian LaRoche&#8217;s NetKit packages did a good job of reigning in that chaos. Finally there was one single authoritative source for most of the programs and there was a known place one could go and pick them up.</p>
<p>Unfortunately getting NetKits to compile was a bit of a chore, and Florian himself disappeared off the net for a while, so by June of 1996 there hadn&#8217;t been any updates in a good while and various changes to the kernel and libc made the existing NetKit versions excessively hard to work with. More importantly, there was at least one outstanding security problem.</p>
<p>There had been a bunch of NetKits, but only NetKit-A and NetKit-B had wide distribution. NetKit-A was almost entirely just repackaging of things maintained by other people, while NetKit-B contained a pile of modified BSD code that had been maintained by Florian. Since most of the contents of NetKit-A had been updated separately since NetKit-A was last released, I simply killed off NetKit-A, and continued with just NetKit-B. &#8221; (<a href="http://www.hcs.harvard.edu/~dholland/computers/old-netkit.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.hcs.harvard.edu/~dholland/computers/old-netkit.html</a>)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Por: João Matos</title>
		<link>http://v1.pedrocavaco.adamastor.org/2006/06/13/qui-ftp/#comment-2923</link>
		<dc:creator>João Matos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2006 15:35:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pedrocavaco.adamastor.org/2006/06/13/qui-ftp/#comment-2923</guid>
		<description>Se calhar é porque, sei lá, por exemplo, o ftp original foi feito para o BSD original, assim como a maioria das implementações de protocolos e aplicações de rede nos sitemas operativos actuais...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Se calhar é porque, sei lá, por exemplo, o ftp original foi feito para o BSD original, assim como a maioria das implementações de protocolos e aplicações de rede nos sitemas operativos actuais&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
